Macro
13 min read 18 Dec 25
2025 has been a tale of two stories, with the strong performance of most asset classes belying the prevailing narrative of uncertainty amid volatility. With geopolitical tensions, growing fiscal burdens and fears of an artificial intelligence (AI) bubble still weighing on investors’ minds, a key question as we head into the new year is whether markets can continue their positive momentum.
As we enter 2026, M&G Investments’ Chief Investment Officers (CIOs) from Equities and Multi Asset, Fixed Income and Private Markets give their perspectives on their respective asset classes and provide insights on how to steer through today’s challenging environment.
Co-Manager, M&G Episode Macro Strategy
In 2025, most major asset classes delivered positive returns, despite repeated shocks. Yet, a sense of unease has grown among investors. Tristan Hanson, Co-Manager of the M&G Episode Macro Strategy, points to elevated equity valuations and worries over credit quality, on top of the existing issues of policy unpredictability and sovereign debt levels, as causes of investor angst.
A big debate among investors is whether we are in an AI boom or bubble. However, Hanson argues it is more helpful to look for signs of emotionally-driven behaviour: are investors focused on returns or risk of loss?
“Given considerable excitement about the potential of certain companies to make money from AI, there is scope for disappointment if some of the planned expenditure proves excessive or somewhat cyclical,” he suggests.
Aside from the AI frenzy, Hanson believes central banks will come back into focus in 2026. The market may be pricing in around 100 basis points of interest rate cuts in the US next year, but sticky inflation and political pressure could complicate the Federal Reserve’s job.
Hanson sees reasons to believe that markets can remain resilient but we may also discover whether investors’ optimism is justified. Inevitably, there will be unforeseen events in the year ahead but adopting a disciplined, diversified approach could potentially help investors find long-term value in 2026.
CIO, Equities and Multi Asset
After driving markets since late 2022, investors are beginning to question whether the AI bonanza is about to come to a halt.
Fabiana Fedeli, CIO Equities, Multi Asset and Sustainability, shares her view: “AI is not a bubble. It is a technology that has developed into a powerful tool, generative AI, capable of bringing structural change to the way we live and work.”
For Fedeli, AI’s power is in its pervasiveness, its ability to be applied to so many of our daily processes, products and services. And we are only at the very start of broader application.
If there is a bubble, Fedeli suggests it is not in the technology but in the valuations of a specific group of companies. So where to now for these stocks? Fedeli highlights three possible outcomes:
While any of these outcomes have a decent chance of occurring, Fedeli says that, for investors, getting the timing right is just as crucial as investing in the right asset. She favours casting a wider investment net to capture AI-related opportunities. “Importantly, as the tide that lifted all boats starts to recede, this is the time to let go of passive exposure to AI stocks, and take a more active investment approach,” she maintains.
Aside from AI “enablers” (companies supplying the key technology), Fedeli believes there are two other sets of winners: those firms that deploy AI to reallocate economic resources more efficiently, and those firms that support such reallocation through their services.
As we enter 2026, Fedeli says we should not be asking whether we’re in an AI bubble but, rather, can we identify which companies are quietly taking advantage of what AI has to offer, and whose attractive valuations allow for upside. This requires rigorous due diligence to separate hype from substance and identify the winners of tomorrow.
CIO Fixed Income
Low interest rates and quantitative easing defined the decade following the Global Financial Crisis, skewing risk to the point that there was very little compensation in bonds. But in 2025, yields on government bonds have returned to a healthy starting place.
Given attractive real yields across fixed income markets, Andrew Chorlton, CIO Fixed Income, believes bonds offer good value compared to equities. Given the government bond yield currently makes up about 80% of the all-in yield in investment grade credit, in his view, government bonds provide an attractive source of income without taking on additional credit risk, especially as interest rates could fall and historically tight credit spreads could widen.
According to Chorlton, central bankers are currently walking a difficult tightrope, that is the balance between keeping inflation around their target rate while addressing sluggish growth rates across the developed world. “While we can see visible signs of a softening in the economy, mismanaged inflation remains a potentially corrosive force,” he notes.
This balancing act is made more complicated by renewed political pressure on the Federal Reserve. 2026 will be a decisive year for the central bank’s independence as President Trump appoints a Chair to replace the outgoing Jerome Powell. In the short term, the President could use the process to extol the need for further interest rate cuts. However, the long-term impact would be an undermining of credibility in, arguably, the most important central bank in the world.
In contrast to the macroeconomic uncertainty, fiscal deterioration, and volatility that has challenged developed markets (DM), emerging markets (EM) have exhibited significant resilience over the last few years, proving a compelling alternative to DM.
Supported by generally lower debt levels, both in sovereigns and corporates, continued strong growth and decreasing dependency on the dollar and the US economic cycle, Chorlton notes that EM debt has emerged as an attractive space for fixed income investors, particularly those seeking diversification. Because if there is one thing that is certain, it is that there is always more uncertainty on the horizon.
CIO, Private Markets
Going into 2026, Emmanuel Deblanc, CIO Private Markets, believes there are reasons to be optimistic about private markets: the interest rate environment now appears more stable, the IPO market is beginning to re-open (facilitating a recycling of capital), and there is evidence of a renewed focus on operational value creation.
Within private equity, underwriting has become more disciplined, and private credit continues to expand, continuing to blur the lines between public and private lending. There is also pent-up demand across private markets to deploy dry powder and exit a backlog of mature assets, which may drive near-term deal activity levels.
According to Deblanc, private credit continues to be one of the most dynamic segments, offering increased diversification, yield enhancement and floating-rate appeal. While there is increasing chatter about the potential for systemic risk emerging in private credit, he believes it is important to distinguish between the two principal markets: the US and Europe.
Comparing both, Europe has historically offered superior risk-adjusted returns relative to the US, as well as superior credit quality, with Europe offering higher interest cover and lower default rates1.
Within private equity, Deblanc notes that underlying operating performance remains healthy. There are also signs the IPO market is mounting a partial rebound and demand is clearly there. “There is a long tail of pent-up IPOs which if it continues into 2026, coupled with the potential for some out-sized PE exits, should improve top-line exit figures, and with it, investor confidence,” he says.
Heading into 2026, Deblanc sees the most compelling opportunities sitting within truly transformative sectors. In his view, technology-centric industries such as climate tech, fintech, cybersecurity and health tech, as well as those innovating within energy transition and leading environmental and societal change, are poised to deliver highly-attractive returns. Further interest rate cuts will also likely prove a tailwind for private equity in 2026, supporting both transaction and exit activity.
Head of Property Research
Global real estate is stabilising after two years of sharp repricing and frozen liquidity, but recovery is far from uniform. Yields have rebased, sentiment is improving and deal flow is returning, yet structural forces – not short-term rebounds – will define the next cycle, argues Richard Gwilliam, Head of Property Research. Capital is moving toward certainty and resilience, favouring assets that can withstand volatility and deliver sustainable growth.
Europe and Asia Pacific (APAC) are leading the recovery as investors diversify beyond the US. European transaction volumes are forecast to rise 7% year-on-year, while APAC has seen cross-border investment surge 88%, driven by policy support and lower financing costs. Gwillam notes that South Korea, Japan and Australia are emerging as key hubs, reinforcing the shift toward markets combining stability with growth potential.
For Gwilliam, sector performance highlights the uneven nature of recovery. “Prime central business district offices remain in demand, while secondary stock faces mounting obsolescence amid hybrid work and ESG pressure,” he observes. Logistics is entering a selective phase, with core urban hubs outperforming peripheral corridors. Living sectors continue to show resilience, underpinned by chronic undersupply and demographic trends, while retail is rebounding in pockets through experience-led formats.
Looking ahead, Gwillam believes structural themes will shape returns: AI-driven workplace change, demographic pressure on housing, supply-chain modernisation and sustainability as a capital filter. In his view, the winners of the next cycle will not be those who simply ride the recovery, but those who reinvent – embedding ESG, leveraging technology and aligning strategies with long-term demand drivers.
Investments involve risks and may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The value of investments may go up or down and is not guaranteed. You may not recover the full amount you invested. The views expressed in this document should not be taken as a recommendation, advice or forecast. If you are in any doubt about the contents of this document, you should seek independent professional advice.
All forms of investments carry risks and such investments may not be suitable for everyone. This material is for general information purposes only without regard to your investment objectives or financial situation and should not be interpreted or constituted as an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice to buy or sell securities or pursue any particular investment strategy or investment product in any jurisdiction or country, nor is it a commitment from M&G Investments (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Nothing in this material constitutes accounting, legal, regulatory, tax or other advice.
The Fund mentioned herein is sub-fund of M&G (Lux) Investment Funds 1, an open-ended investment company established in Luxembourg. M&G (Lux) Investments Funds 1 has appointed M&G Investments (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. as its Singapore representative and agent for service of process. The value of investments and the income from them can fluctuate and is not guaranteed. Rates of exchange may cause the value of investments to go up or down. Investors may not get back the amount they invest. Subscriptions in the fund are valid only if made on the basis of the current prospectus and product highlights sheet available on our website at mandg.com/sg and you must read these documents before deciding whether to invest.
This material is issued by M&G Investments (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (UEN 201131425R), which is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.