Equities
8 min read 10 Dec 25
The rise in energy demand driven by the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has been widely written about; many consider it a potential bottleneck to growth. However, in our view, its relative scale and the resultant impact on the environment is not well understood.
Many forecasters conclude that while energy demand from AI data centres will grow rapidly, it will remain a small contributor to overall energy demand. Indeed, the International Energy Agency (IEA) asserts that AI data centres will account for less energy demand than electric vehicles (EVs) and industry growth.
Furthermore, the operators of large-scale data centres, the so-called hyperscalers, have set net zero targets and are rapidly increasing their use of power purchase agreements (long-term contracts for electricity supply) and low carbon energy; they are also improving the energy efficiency of their data centres.
AI data-centre energy forecasts may also underappreciate AI’s role in reducing energy demand in end-use cases; this could cancel out increased data-centre energy demand. Thus, the impact on the environment may be much less material than initially anticipated.
Observation: AI’s power needs are growing rapidly but will likely only account for a minor share of global energy demand.
AI computing is inherently more energy intensive than traditional computing due to the large amounts of data processed in both training and usage. According to the IEA, global energy consumption from data centres (all workloads, including AI) is expected to grow at a 15% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 269 terawatt-hours (TWh) in 2024 to 946 TWh in 20301.
Accelerated servers, used mainly in AI computing, are expected to grow at a 30% CAGR to 2030, and are therefore set to contribute 50% of the growth in total data-centre energy demand during this time.
Despite this rapid growth, the contribution to overall energy demand is expected to remain small. The IEA estimates that total data-centre share of overall global energy demand will increase from 1.5% to only 3% by 2030 in its base case.
Even in its scenario of rapid adoption of AI, data-centre demand reaches only 4% of total energy demand by 2030. It forecasts that as a sector data centres will be the fifth largest contributor to growth in energy demand, with industry (excluding heavy industry) contributing 3x as much and electric transport 50% more.
The impact on emissions is also not as material as one might think. The IEA estimates in its base case that AI will account for 1% of all energy emissions by 2030 and decline thereafter as AI efficiencies are brought to the energy system.
Observation: Growth in energy demand will be powered by renewables as tech companies target emissions reductions.
Most cloud-computing companies have voluntarily set 2030 net zero targets, except Amazon which targets 2040. These companies plan to achieve this through the use of clean energy, renewable energy purchases, data-centre efficiencies and 24/7 clean energy matching.
Given the pace of investment in AI, and thus the need for power, hyperscalers prioritise fast-to-market solutions. This perhaps explains their preference for power purchase agreements (PPAs), which involve long-term contracts to purchase renewable energy from an existing renewable generator.
In 2024, Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Meta signed deals for 25 gigawatts (GW) of clean PPAs, equivalent to 43% of clean PPAs globally.
Nuclear power is also becoming an attractive option for tech companies as it is low carbon emitting and provides the consistent baseload power needed for data centres. However, available capacity is limited, and capital expenditure (capex) requirements and lead times are significant.
Despite this, since 2023 cloud providers have signed a total pipeline of 32GW worth of nuclear power contracts in the US, according to BloombergNEF (BNEF)2. Some companies are using the restart of existing nuclear power plants to circumvent the long lead times involved.
For example, Microsoft is funding the restart of Three Mile Island, an 837MW nuclear plant in Pennsylvania, which will commence operations in 2027. Meanwhile, Amazon is investing in new technologies – specifically, 5GW of small modular reactors (SMRs), which will come online over the next 15 years.
Cloud computing providers are also turning to other clean technologies, such as hydrogen fuel cells as contracted by Oracle. Other businesses, such as xAI, are using utility scale battery storage (BESS) to smooth electricity demand thus enabling the use of variable renewables supply.
Some hyperscalers are starting to turn to natural gas given its quick time to power. For example, Meta’s data centres in Louisiana will be powered by 2GW of gas-fired power. Others are hesitant about the resultant emissions footprint from this approach, with Microsoft only considering natural gas with carbon capture technology.
Observation: The energy efficiency of data centres will continue to improve.
Energy efficiency in data centres has played a critical role in curbing growth in energy demand. During the last decade of cloud adoption, energy demand has remained flat3.
This can partly be explained by a shift of workloads from enterprise data centres to hyperscalers. The latter have an efficiency (measured in power usage effectiveness (PUE)4) 60% higher than enterprises. It can also be explained by hyperscalers improving their PUE during this time. Google, for example, has reduced its PUE from 1.20 to 1.10 over 14 years5.
The rate of improvements in energy efficiency of the total data centre fleet will likely slow as the shift to hyperscalers slows down. However, hyperscalers will likely continue to improve the energy efficiency of their data centres. This will include:
Overall, the IEA expects energy saving initiatives will result in a 17% reduction in data-centre energy demand between 2024 and 2030, largely in conventional servers and power infrastructure7.
In the best case, it expects a 15% improvement in data-centre efficiency, which would result in data centres, including AI and non-AI, only accounting for 2.6% of energy demand by 2030.
Observation: AI will also enable energy savings in end-use cases.
The energy savings that AI could enable through optimising energy generation, distribution and end consumption are often overlooked, in our view. Applications in real time electricity dispatching could have material impacts. Other end-use applications include building management, robots in manufacturing, predictive maintenance, fleet management and EV charging.
Some of the companies in our portfolios are actively deploying AI technologies to reduce their own energy consumption and those of their customers. For example:
The IEA estimates that, in the case of rapid adoption of AI, 8% energy savings could be achieved in light industry and as much as 20% in EVs by 2035. Overall, in this scenario, AI would lead to a reduction of 1.4 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide. Further, research by consultants PwC finds that from 2024 to 2035 total energy savings outside data centres would be 0.1% to 1.0% and would roughly offset an increase in energy usage due to AI8.
Other studies have drawn similar conclusions showing that AI can have meaningful impact on the energy transition9. For example, Google’s DeepMind model has identified 45 times the number of theoretical crystals than discovered so far, helping to further the development of renewable energy and storage technologies. However, the rate of adoption of these technologies is uncertain and the impact of rebound effects, that is an increase in demand due to cost savings, is also very unclear.
There are of course other environmental risks such as the increased use of water associated with data-centre growth. Though water is predominantly used in energy generation, it is also increasingly employed in cooling. New technologies in liquid cooling, such as direct-to-chip cooling, could address this issue.
Conclusion: Clean energy and use of AI may be silver lining to growth in energy demand.
Growth in energy demand as a result of AI adoption is expected to be material. However, this must be put into the context of growth in electrification more broadly. Motivated by their net zero targets, hyperscalers are increasingly contracting clean energy to meet energy demand; they are also investing heavily in energy and water efficiency, thus reducing their impact on the environment.
AI’s role in reducing energy demand should also be considered. If rapidly adopted, it could offset growth in energy demand, as well as emissions from AI computing. However, the rate of adoption is of course still uncertain. It appears therefore that every cloud, even those run by hyperscalers, may have a silver lining.
1 IEA, ‘Energy and AI – World Energy Outlook Special Report’, (iea.org), April 2025.
2 BNEF, ‘Power Hungry Data Centres Are Driving Green Energy Demand’, (about.bnef.com), August 2025.
3 Oxford Energy Forum, ‘AI’s indirect impacts on climate outweigh concerns over its direct energy footprint’, (oxfordenergy.org), Issue 145, May 2025.
4 The energy efficiency of a data centre is measured by the Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE). This measures the total energy used by the facility compared to the energy used by its IT equipment.
5 Google, ‘2024 Environmental Report’, (sustainability.google), July 2024.
6 Oxford Energy Forum, ‘AI’s indirect impacts on climate outweigh concerns over its direct energy footprint’, (oxfordenergy.org), Issue 145, May 2025.
7 IEA, ‘Energy and AI – World Energy Outlook Special Report’, (iea.org), April 2025.
8 PWC, ‘Could net-zero AI become a reality?’, (pwc.com), April 2025.
9 Scientific American, ‘AI’s Climate Impact Goes beyond Its Emissions’, (scientificamerican.com), December 2023 and Nature, ‘Green and intelligent: the role of AI in the climate transition’, (nature.com), June 2025.
The value of investments will fluctuate, which will cause prices to fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the original amount they invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The views expressed in this document should not be taken as a recommendation, advice or forecast.